HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 16:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 520
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.8% Below average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 48.5
44% 53.2 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 0.2
22% 30.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 56 30 28 30 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
135GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 130 123 130 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 123
Write 105
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 128
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback