Gigabyte GA-X3V7

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X3V7 (all builds)
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '24 at 20:49
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HK 18,903 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 116 56% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 301 31% 251 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3458) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.35% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 3.1 2% 3 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.9 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.35% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Gigabyte(1458 3458) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.2% Below average	Lighting 45.1 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 34.7 37% 35.2 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 48.9 Splatting 53 32% 36.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 427% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 1095 1204 812 937 1079 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,623 Write 1,486 Mixed 1,021 SusWrite 1,057 291% 1,297 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 32.5 105% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 436 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 236 214% 330 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 672%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2933C17S4/32G 2x31.5GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 30.5 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 22.6 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	7	60	14"	1280 720	SHP1401 LQ140Z1JW01

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X3V7 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X3V7

CPU
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	7x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	7x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2x

SSD
CX2-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 177%, 201 samples	4x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 172%, 3,650 samples	2x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBR 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 32GBUnknownBench 70%, 8 samples	2x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 78%, 2,464 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16