PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C31 |
Motherboard | MSI B365M PRO-VH (MS-7C31) (all builds) |
Memory | 0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1520 x 720 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200604 |
Uptime | 6.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 01 '24 at 14:31 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 615 180 326 179 361 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown IRX3200D464L16S/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 35 | 5 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1017 | PHLC156 PHL 273V7 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,492x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 534x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 167x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $235Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 291x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $291Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 280x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 214x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $434 |