Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 12:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 98.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 282
99% 177 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 857
81% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Asus(1043 87D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 309
Parallax 335
259% 321 fps
MRender 341
Gravity 256
Splatting 193
207% 263 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 1839 1873 1924 1909 1903 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,513
Write 2999
Mixed 2,746
SusWrite 1,890
573% 2,537 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 98.5
322% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1171
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 1,006
756% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 362%
Great: 519%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-16GFX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 79.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 54
154% 54 GB/s
SC Read 37.2
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 49
109% 38 GB/s
Latency 41.3
97% 41.3 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 147%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 144 27" 2048 1152 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,017
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback