Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '24 at 03:20
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 122 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 634 71% 558 Pts	64-Core 657 41% 657 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8546) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.7% Very good	Lighting 87.5 Reflection 144 Parallax 90.9 71% 108 fps	MRender 91.1 Gravity 87.2 Splatting 79.2 70% 85.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 916GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 480 Write 436 Mixed 406 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 41.9 163% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 299 240% 337 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 123%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB 4,891 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 194GB free Firmware: GU001U Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 68 Write 66 Mixed 13.5 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x16GB 716 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 27 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 23.5 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	120	23.8"	1280 720	SAM710A F24G3xTF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	652x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	205x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	170x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	129x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $540

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16