MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20231013
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '24 at 03:19
Run Duration	304 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 71.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 278 87% 163 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 945 89% 737 Pts	64-Core 1,408 87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.7% Average	Lighting 59.9 Reflection 60.7 Parallax 82.1 49% 67.6 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 44.7 46% 57 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VP4100 2TB 347 User benchmarks, average bench 363% 981GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1911 875 879 914 917 919 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,785 Write 3,371 Mixed 1,585 SusWrite 1069 442% 1,952 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 57.9 192% 70.4 MB/s	DQ Read 969 DQ Write 655 DQ Mixed 817 608% 813 MB/s
Poor: 205% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 490%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$150 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 316GB free Firmware: X61170RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 332 Write 364 Mixed 278 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 40.7 141% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 211 161% 219 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 119%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$150 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 318GB free Firmware: X61170RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 350 Write 370 Mixed 292 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 35.7 134% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 203 158% 217 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 119%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free Firmware: FP1R Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 170 Write 172 Mixed 70.2 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 669% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP1R Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 177 Write 176 Mixed 72.1 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 665% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP1R Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 177 Write 167 Mixed 72 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 438% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: FP1R Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 158 Write 154 Mixed 65.9 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 273% 2 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
hp v150w 32GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 2d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 36.6 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.7 11% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 471 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.6% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 26.3 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 25 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	55	144	27"	1280 720	ACR064D Acer XF270H B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,945x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,546x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,299x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	767x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	622x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	602x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	501x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	382x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $138Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	368x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	433x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	268x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	231x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $999

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16