Lenovo 3212CTO

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 3212CTO (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	14.1 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '23 at 18:12
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 97 2-Core 190 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 352 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.8% Very good	Lighting 93.4 Reflection 107 Parallax 96.2 76% 98.8 fps	MRender 93.2 Gravity 95.4 Splatting 96.7 78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$87 19,345 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 202 200 211 228 183 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.7% Good	Read 227 Write 219 Mixed 181 SusWrite 192 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 30.3 99% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 189 145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 179GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 119 126 126 126 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 140 Write 129 Mixed 74.1 SusWrite 119 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 04CD F3-14900CL10-8GBXL Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 18GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	0.7"	1280 720	FNI0000 LCD TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 3212CTO Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo 3212CTO

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	9x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	1x

GPU
RX 560AMD $500Bench 22%, 60,738 samples	3x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	2x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	2x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	2x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 46%, 6 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	1x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 60%, 1,419 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $797

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16