Lenovo 30BQS07B00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30BQS07B00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1036
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 13:49
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2245
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 960
91% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,337
83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 88.5
53% 72 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 46.6
49% 61 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 826 828 812 816 811 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,396
Write 2,549
Mixed 1,862
SusWrite 865
430% 1,918 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 84.2
276% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 846
631% 846 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 272%
Great: 347%
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
238GB free
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 322 322 322 322 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 482
Write 320
Mixed 222
SusWrite 322
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 15.1
100% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 86.1
105% 180 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
885GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2513 2514 2513 1583 1339 1453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,624
Write 2596
Mixed 1,933
SusWrite 1,986
514% 2,285 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.1
294% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 902
670% 894 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 357%
Great: 435%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 5.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 192 194 191 195 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 181
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 192
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.4
378% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 112%
Great: 138%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
510GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 129 127 129 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 88.2
Write 91
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 128
59% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 51.8
MC Mixed 34.7
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 4R 9G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 10% 77 208 59 75 27" 1280 720 PHLC156 PHL 273V7
History: Score 20: 0P 1R 4G 3B | Score 37: 0P 5R 4G 0B | Score 48: 0P 4R 9G 1B
Typical 30BQS07B00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 30BQS07B00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback