HP All-in-One 22-dd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP All-in-One 22-dd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86F0
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230717
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Memory 16.6
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 104
29% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 149
17% 135 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 86F0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 3.4
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH128HBHQ-000H1 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 97 94 89 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 366
Write 111
Mixed 157
SusWrite 95.1
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 23.6
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 156
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S1MR-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 383
10% 383 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN402F HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One 22-dd0xxx Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 22-dd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback