Panasonic CF-20-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-20-2  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF20-2
Memory2.1 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220831
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 02:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7Y57
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 97.3
39% 65 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 108
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7001T 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 270 285 294 276 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 337
Write 298
Mixed 284
SusWrite 281
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 9.5
47% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 33.2
54% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CF20-2 0AKKC49299 CF20-2 0AKKC49299 56GB
1867, 1867, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 33 60 10" 1280 720 YLT4100 Internal LCD
Typical CF-20-2 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-20-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback