Gigabyte GA-B760M DS3H AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M DS3H AX  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 206
2-Core 412
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 805
8-Core 1518
138% 1,162 Pts
64-Core 2,319
144% 2,319 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 87A7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 51.4
45% 54.2 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 43.6
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 228 209 172 235 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 479
Write 421
Mixed 385
SusWrite 227
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 30.4
139% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 123
126% 213 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 117%
WALRAM 256GB
173GB free
Firmware: V1.002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 425 424 424 424 364 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 422
Mixed 363
SusWrite 412
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 35.6
136% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 204
159% 214 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 202%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2118 3805 3688 1411 1263 1265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
438% Outstanding
Read 3,757
Write 3,020
Mixed 2,499
SusWrite 2,258
646% 2,884 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 70.2
231% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 2,079
DQ Write 1,460
DQ Mixed 1722
1,299% 1,754 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 438%
Great: 537%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
168GB free
Firmware: VT100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 55 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 41.6
Mixed 38
SusWrite 55.1
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
583GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 143 140 144 142 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 88.8
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 141
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
156% Outstanding
MC Read 63.6
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 57.4
175% 61.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 29.5
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 156%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 100 24" 1920 1027 AUS24C2 VG248
Typical GA-B760M DS3H AX Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M DS3H AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback