Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 01:12
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 539
66% 503 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB; Galax
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 172
Parallax 166
148% 173 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 135
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-128V2G-HP 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2803
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 105 98 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 478
Write 147
Mixed 187
SusWrite 108
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 31.9
96% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 152
126% 185 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 81%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 960GB-$300
126GB free
Firmware: X212T0RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 440 437 448 456 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 418
Mixed 253
SusWrite 449
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 33
112% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 160
171% 285 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 114%
Spcc M.2 SSD 120GB
75GB free
Firmware: Q0627A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 146 55 59 64 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 492
Write 244
Mixed 296
SusWrite 104
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
49% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
161GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 106 109 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 170
Write 141
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 105
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
562GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 99 97 96 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 151
Write 178
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 95.4
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2472 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26.9" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MSI MAG274QRF
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback