Corsair VOYAGER a1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemCorsair VOYAGER a1600  (all builds)
MotherboardCorsair Voyager a1600
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 00:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 336
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 1,182
111% 920 Pts
64-Core 1,367
85% 1,367 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800M
Device(1CFA 0004) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.40.58.08
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 134
Parallax 234
102% 164 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 131
Splatting 173
141% 172 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00A00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 1710 1789 1959 1964 1850 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,106
Write 1,878
Mixed 1,990
SusWrite 1,795
438% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 69.8
236% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,140
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 1,144
756% 915 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 303%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5S16G3A48Z40A2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 43.5
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 51
SC Mixed 31.8
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 127%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0A3B
Typical VOYAGER a1600 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Corsair VOYAGER a1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback