Acer Aspire XC-840

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-840  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-840
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 00:02
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 29.5
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 62.4
32% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 92
8-Core 99.5
13% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 56.5
4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1561) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 586 663 870 731 927 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 828
Write 878
Mixed 655
SusWrite 746
175% 777 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 19.3
70% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 204
145% 185 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 108%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P32NC4U1-BEYS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 18.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 57 29 60 24.1" 1280 720 LEN1144 LEN LT2452pwC
Typical Aspire XC-840 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback