Gigabyte GA-A55M-S2HP

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A55M-S2HP (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110713
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3670 APU 2,400 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 49.4 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 69.1 33% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 92.3 8-Core 111 13% 102 Pts	64-Core 77.1 5% 77.1 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	53.1% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 61.1 54% 64.3 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 67.3 Splatting 61.1 52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G3 120GB 1,092 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMP1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 105 103 57 103 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 307 Write 288 Mixed 137 SusWrite 96.4 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 28.4 71% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 172 147% 216 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 123GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 121 125 130 124 133 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 132 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 127 77% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 10.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.1 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	29	60	24"	1280 720	CHD0240 PMO S241-IFC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A55M-S2HP Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A55M-S2HP

CPU
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	6x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	4x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	7x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	2x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
2.5" SATA3-128GB SSD 128GB980plusBench 66%, 66 samples	2x
SSDPR-CL100-120-G3 120GBBench 63%, 1,092 samples	2x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16