Micro UM690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro UM690  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFC
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221123
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 18:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 354
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,262
118% 981 Pts
64-Core 1,441
89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.20.10
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 79.6
37% 60.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 28.1
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1086 767 264 356 288 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,595
Write 3788
Mixed 2,777
SusWrite 501
492% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 95.5
338% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 1028
757% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 243%
Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD48S40BS8MA-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 43.8
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 32.1
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 127%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 BBY2422 INSIGNIA-TV
Typical UM690 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback