Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100F-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 180
2-Core 309
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 800
82% 663 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Asus(1043 05E3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 141
Parallax 240
98% 167 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 126
Splatting 194
150% 182 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1636 1639 284 244 49 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,322
Write 1,485
Mixed 1,320
SusWrite 650
269% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 80.9
302% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,351
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 1,030
779% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 233%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3600 C20 Series 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 10% 20 217 59 60 72.3" 1536 793 SNY5803 SONY TV
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback