Ciara DQ67SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCiara DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 17:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$196
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 184
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 448
50% 393 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Dell(1028 1265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.19
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 47.3
44% 52 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 44.2
37% 44.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 256GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010CL00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 380
Mixed 331
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 4.9
48% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 228
191% 277 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 91%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
628GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 98 94 92 101 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 98.2
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 94
69% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-059.A00LF 9905474-059.A00LF 9905474-050.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 ACR06EC BH276 P
Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback