HP 500-490nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-490nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 12:37
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 530
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 30.4
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 112 117 128 119 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 137
Write 117
Mixed 82
SusWrite 117
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 19" 1280 720 KTC1993 W9009S-D
Typical 500-490nf Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-490nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback