Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 10:53
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,120
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,190
136% 2,190 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
ASRock(1849 5202) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 245
Parallax 426
170% 293 fps
MRender 406
Gravity 169
Splatting 0.5
135% 192 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 147%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 159 35 50 19 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 492
Write 414
Mixed 198
SusWrite 82
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 31.8
113% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 154
117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 88%
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
383GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 141 143 213 228 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 349
Write 440
Mixed 128
SusWrite 188
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 30.3
139% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 133
120% 183 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 118%
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB
186GB free
Firmware: P3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 54 31 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 131
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 49.8
88% 418 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 24.3
101% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 32.6
DQ Mixed 47
49% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 225%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
787GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 125 116 119 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 168
Write 138
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 119
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
518GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 154 156 156 157 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 153
Write 121
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 156
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 38.7
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 36.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 38.5" 1280 720 BBY3963 NS39DR510CA17
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback