Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 02:52
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 316
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 960
99% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 303
Parallax 323
245% 309 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 251
Splatting 190
208% 264 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 206%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPD001T 1TB
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMM0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,178
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,466
350% 1,551 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 82.7
291% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,329
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,178
878% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 319%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
4GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.3
Write 5.2
Mixed 10.2
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.5
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback