Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 23:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 70.9
30% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 193
20% 163 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.20.25.02
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 50.7
47% 56.5 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 48.5
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 179 183 178 189 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 944
Write 830
Mixed 666
SusWrite 218
148% 665 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 26.1
91% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 269
201% 272 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 187%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
35GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 151 150 151 151 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 382
Write 353
Mixed 323
SusWrite 176
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 24.4
80% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 231
175% 236 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 22.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 16.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 120 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0036
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback