HP ProBook 445 G7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook 445 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8730
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221230
Uptime8 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 19:54
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 66.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 265
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 870
85% 697 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8730) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.10.18.09
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 16
Parallax 24.2
6% 15.8 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 0
8% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 910
Write 859
Mixed 912
200% 894 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 45.7
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 493
439% 659 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 203%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 61.2
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 24.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO723C
Typical ProBook 445 G7 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 445 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback