Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 19:13
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 139
54% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 312
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 117
Parallax 153
110% 135 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 131
Splatting 107
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-512G-1101 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2455 2453 2182 1987 2097 641 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2837
Write 2,778
Mixed 2,161
SusWrite 1,969
548% 2,436 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 58.4
203% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 465
350% 472 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 318%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 29.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 25.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 21 100 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3937 OMEN 24
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback