Medion MD34379/C895

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Medion MD34379/C895 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B360H4-EM
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '23 at 15:31
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 238 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 534 65% 497 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Elitegroup(1019 1046) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.5% Poor	Lighting 36 Reflection 40 Parallax 40.9 29% 39 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 26.7 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P3 500GB 237 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR40A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 97 51 37 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 884 Write 49.4 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 54.6 55% 261 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 3.8 54% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 53 DQ Mixed 107 104% 176 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 880GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 185 189 186 193 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 177 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 188 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 1x8GB 5,207 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	57	60	23.8"	1280 720	HPN3605 HP 24fw

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34379/C895 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Medion MD34379/C895

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x

SSD
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 256GBBench 140%, 650 samples	7x
CT500P3 500GBNvmeBench 209%, 237 samples	2x

RAM
9905702-017.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 5,207 samples	5x
9905702-017.A00G Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GBKingstonBench 67%, 6 samples	2x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16