MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 13:05
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,120
101% 853 Pts
64-Core 1126
70% 1126 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
EVGA(3842 3188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 179
Parallax 182
144% 179 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
130% 164 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303226
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,334
Write 2,189
Mixed 1,374
368% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 69.5
221% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 59.9
220% 483 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 266%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
118GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 194 81 82 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 479
Mixed 438
SusWrite 165
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 53.5
178% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Crucial_CT250MX200SSD1 512GB
341GB free
Firmware: VE0R840H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 389 422 427 423 421 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
Read 256
Write 242
Mixed 343
SusWrite 383
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 35
120% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 162
131% 179 MB/s
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
69GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 317 319 319 319 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 478
Mixed 460
SusWrite 340
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 56.4
188% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
223GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 85 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 80.3
Write 83.7
Mixed 69
SusWrite 82.3
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVR 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 29.7
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 217 60 60 28.9" 1280 720 PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $852
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback