Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory47.4 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 03:38
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 94
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 684
60% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,657
102% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 172
421% 172 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 371 369 369 371 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 453
Write 372
Mixed 312
SusWrite 362
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 22.2
73% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 213
163% 221 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73%
Great: 129%
HP 365GB MLC PCIe ioDrive2 for ProLiant Servers 365GB
223GB free
Firmware: 7.1.15 rev 110356 Public Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 512 505 504 500 498 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 514
Mixed 488
SusWrite 492
121% 540 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 25.5
86% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 144
152% 255 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 151%
Fusion-io ioScale 1.30TB
114GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 671 796 784 773 777 766 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 85% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GB
7 of 8 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 23" 1280 720 SAM041F SyncMaster
Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback