Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 176
2-Core 310
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 942
92% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.2% Good
Lighting 89.3
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 78.6
73% 85.8 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 72
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 283 279 276 275 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 282
Mixed 278
SusWrite 280
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 29.3
153% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 216
185% 272 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
51GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 318 317 320 320 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 462
Mixed 456
SusWrite 336
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 55.6
195% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 337
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$79
271GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 93 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 156
Write 152
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 94.4
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 9
Mixed 9.7
33% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
57% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C15-8GVGB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 18
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 56 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0750 VG240Y S
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-E D4 Builds (Compare 1,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback