HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime44.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 17:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2135
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 269
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 851
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 113
Parallax 131
104% 124 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 114
Splatting 105
107% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg50pnv2t04 TOSHIBA 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AFHB4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,192
Write 965
Mixed 554
200% 904 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 27.2
115% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 309
352% 609 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 18
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 10.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ78C6 BenQ GW2760
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback