MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 338
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,166
108% 904 Pts
64-Core 1,512
94% 1,512 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 202
Parallax 235
106% 189 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 148
Splatting 94.7
96% 120 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80007E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 261 264 262 245 242 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,075
Write 600
Mixed 440
SusWrite 254
131% 592 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 45.9
204% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 477
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 257
229% 349 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 137%
Great: 167%
Drevo X1 SSD 240GB
138GB free
Firmware: Q0322A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 233 235 244 244 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 367
Write 360
Mixed 326
SusWrite 239
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 39.7
131% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 109
110% 179 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 109%
Micron 1100 SATA 1024GB
260GB free
Firmware: M0DL020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 408 411 424 424 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 269
Write 334
Mixed 245
SusWrite 414
72% 316 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 17
58% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 173
138% 194 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 102%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
677GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 117 119 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 118
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
668GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 134 134 134 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 106
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 135
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
345% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 159 152 150 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 120
Write 135
Mixed 115
SusWrite 152
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
339% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 39.8
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 43.4
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7017 SAMSUNG
Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback