HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8603
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231113
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 659
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.5% Good
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 96
Parallax 89.9
70% 90.6 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 81.8
Splatting 74.9
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128-HP 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A381
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 974
Write 133
Mixed 211
94% 439 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 33.4
120% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 156
121% 168 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 137%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
227GB free
Firmware: RPM2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 140
Mixed 64.3
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 18.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 59 120 23.8" 1280 720 HKC2413 24E4
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx Builds (Compare 1,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback