Asrock A55M-VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A55M-VS  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 15:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3670 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 80.1
38% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 144
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
ASRock(1849 9640) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03150010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 210
Write 185
Mixed 173
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 23.5
75% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 7
28% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
7GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 71 69 70 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 64
Write 68.5
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 70
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905403-038.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 48 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM4C24 19M35
Typical A55M-VS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A55M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback