TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3405VC
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 11:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 64.3
1-Core 185
2-Core 371
106% 207 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,083
109% 886 Pts
64-Core 1728
107% 1728 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 96.5%
 Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 3038) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 27.1
19% 26.5 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 37
Splatting 21.8
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 20.2%
 Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002C30 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1643 1613 1659 1829 1936 1916 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,411
Write 1,822
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 1,766
366% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 35.9
184% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 643
465% 612 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑
This bench: 245%
 Great: 294%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 29.6
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 22.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 85.4%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 6 90 14" 1280 720 SDC4171
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VCB Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VCB

CPU
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples5x
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples1x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples6x
SSD
HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TBNvmeBench 213%, 22 samples5x
SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GBNvmeBench 242%, 600 samples1x
RAM
M471A1G44BB0-CWE Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GBSamsungBench 71%, 117 samples3x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GBMicronBench 72%, 319 samples2x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 73%, 1,021 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback