Apple MacBookAir9,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookAir9,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-0CFF9C7C2B63DF8D
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 04:17
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1060NG7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 119
48% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 196
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Apple(106B 020D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 6
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1149 1241 1203 1193 1227 1198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNFBMALPR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 3% 66 51 12 60 13.3" 1280 720 APPA041 Color LCD
Typical MacBookAir9,1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir9,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback