MSI MS-16W2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 03:29
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 149
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 463
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60pnv2t04 KIOXIA 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AH40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2008 1793 1559 1580 1597 1568 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,843
Write 2,104
Mixed 1484
SusWrite 1,684
401% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 53.6
184% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 581
426% 564 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 258%
Great: 321%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB
937GB free
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2037 2044 1639 1576 1550 1590 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,370
Write 2,086
Mixed 1742
SusWrite 1,739
446% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 65.3
215% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 674
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 586
429% 566 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 293%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBU1X08QJLL42-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 14 0 0" 1280 720
Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback