Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory41.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 02:19
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,088
98% 824 Pts
64-Core 2,292
142% 2,292 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 189
Parallax 243
183% 219 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 218
Splatting 147
165% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,060
Write 2,987
Mixed 1,927
522% 2,325 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 58.8
191% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 90.3
219% 491 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
111GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1066 882 882 881 883 826 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,562
Write 1,554
Mixed 1,584
SusWrite 903
367% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 63.2
219% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 238
286% 534 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 256%
Great: 346%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
772GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2620 2615 2614 2609 1947 1564 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,956
Write 2,455
Mixed 2,744
SusWrite 2,328
590% 2,621 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 72.9
250% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 251
292% 539 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 368%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C16-16GVKC F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3600C16-16GVKC F4-3600C16-8GVKC 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 40.4
122% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 37.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 GSM770F 27GK750F
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback