Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 20:08
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 324
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 1,163
107% 897 Pts
64-Core 1,481
92% 1,481 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 306
Reflection 437
Parallax 676
250% 473 fps
Gravity 240
Splatting 458
324% 349 fps
Poor: 158% Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,388
Write 1881
Mixed 1,509
427% 1,926 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 57.9
192% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 388
380% 620 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Nvme Seagate BarraCud 1TB
137GB free
Firmware: STPSC014 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1190 579 962 650 651 546 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 1,885
Mixed 1,619
SusWrite 763
322% 1,427 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 28.2
131% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,087
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 696
538% 751 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 178%
Great: 287%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
175GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 58 63 60 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 94.9
Write 126
Mixed 48
SusWrite 60.7
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
199% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
232GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 165 166 163 163 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 105
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 163
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
74GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 129 129 131 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69% Good
Read 108
Write 75.2
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 132
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
174% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 42.2
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.7
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 46.2
87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 14% 37 215 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32B1 ASUS XG32V
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO Builds (Compare 1,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback