Avell A52 LIV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Avell A52 LIV (all builds)
Motherboard	Avell Avell A52 LIV
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '23 at 13:25
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 227 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 535 56% 451 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1D05 1099) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.87% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 9.1 Parallax 7.4 5% 7.57 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.5 8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.87% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Device(1D05 1099) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.2% Average	Lighting 50.9 Reflection 58.1 Parallax 48.6 42% 52.5 fps	MRender 57.1 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 46.5 41% 50.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IM2P33F8BR2-256GB 256GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0214B0L Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,375 Write 944 Mixed 788 229% 1,036 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 20.8 142% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 526 DQ Mixed 98.5 172% 332 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 500GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 107 106 103 105 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	56% Above average	Read 89 Write 93.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 105 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1P26KCST2-BABS 2x16GB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 27.5 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 26.4 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	144	15.5"	1920 1080	BOE08E8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A52 LIV Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Avell A52 LIV

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	21x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	17x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	9x

SSD
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata $82Bench 242%, 74,184 samples	11x
IM2P33F8BR2-512GB 512GBBench 170%, 358 samples	9x
IM2P33F8BR2-256GB 256GBBench 133%, 517 samples	6x

RAM
AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 525 samples	28x
AM1P26KCST2-BABS 2x16GBAdataBench 85%, 462 samples	5x
AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 1x8GBAdataBench 42%, 1,420 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $82

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16