Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20231007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 135 2-Core 268 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 853 82% 674 Pts	64-Core 1,422 88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 1527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 106 Parallax 118 90% 112 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 89.6 85% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 258GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 103 86 66 51 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 107 Write 35.2 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 82.6 50% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 113%
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0C- 500GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 70WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 39 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 249%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
KLEVV KD48GU880-32A160T 2x8GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 32.3 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 28.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	100	34"	2752 1089	SAM0F1D C34J79x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	620x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	589x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	467x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	385x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	358x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	189x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	147x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	152x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	117x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16