HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8704
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220720
Uptime	15.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '23 at 10:11
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 141 2-Core 265 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 936 88% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,469 91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.70 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.2% Good	Lighting 82.4 Reflection 83 Parallax 77.8 67% 81.1 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 83.9 Splatting 78 73% 91.2 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,130 Write 1,143 Mixed 464 202% 913 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 51.7 158% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 669 DQ Write 495 DQ Mixed 651 468% 605 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MBB 500GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 128GB free, PID 0718 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 33 33 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 31.8 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 31.8 40% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GB 3,401 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.6% Very good	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 22.8 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 25.7 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	28.4"	2560 1440	SNC3206 G32-001 SKP

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	1,041x
Core i7-10700Intel $232Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	1,022x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	849x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,107x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	753x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	624x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 156%, 9,997 samples	1,340x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 167%, 8,409 samples	274x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 140%, 9,143 samples	234x

RAM
HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 52%, 1,327 samples	735x
HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 1,751 samples	365x
HP32D4U8S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 996 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16