MSI MPG Z590 GAMING EDGE WIFI SP (MS-7D07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D07
MotherboardMSI MPG Z590 GAMING EDGE WIFI SP (MS-7D07)  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220111
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 09:42
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF-$255
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 341
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,235
113% 948 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 118
Parallax 138
109% 130 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 103
Splatting 84.6
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
533GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2242 526 278 274 281 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,937
Write 2,585
Mixed 1,905
SusWrite 647
398% 1,769 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 96.3
333% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,593
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 581
580% 957 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 271%
Great: 348%
Lexar NM620 512GB
121GB free
Firmware: V1.23
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,949
Write 2,359
Mixed 1,722
450% 2,010 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 77.4
303% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 101
326% 702 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 317%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
147GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 447
Mixed 403
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 0.9
28% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 0.9
29% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB
277GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABN0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 21.7
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion HDD 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.6
Write 60.9
Mixed 62.7
44% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
119GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40.2
Write 22.9
Mixed 25.4
35% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5.2
344% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB16GU2666.C8FT CB16GU2666.C8FT CB16GU2666.C8ET CB16GU2666.C8ET 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 30.2
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 0P 4R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0D9 DELL P2419H
Typical MPG Z590 GAMING EDGE WIFI SP (MS-7D07) Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z590 GAMING EDGE WIFI SP (MS-7D07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback