Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 20:17
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 333
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 204
Parallax 143
106% 159 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 171
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 278 336 335 345 330 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 342
Write 236
Mixed 275
SusWrite 316
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 25.1
85% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 40.5
34% 49 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 100%
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
434GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 272 162 57 61 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 295
Write 53.1
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 160
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 0.8
38% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 34.4
DQ Mixed 0.8
9% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 65 206 52 60 48.9" 1280 720 LHCFFFF 49SUWD144FSHQ
Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback