Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 20:10
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 252
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 674
75% 591 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 120
Parallax 113
88% 114 fps
MRender 86.1
Gravity 114
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1261 1571 1157 1145 1129 1140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,890
Write 1,777
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 1,234
381% 1,691 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 63.2
212% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 627
442% 560 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 240%
Great: 592%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 344 376 400 402 406 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.2% Excellent
Read 224
Write 310
Mixed 306
SusWrite 368
69% 302 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 31.9
115% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 360
265% 348 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 325 326 327 327 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,083
Write 1,276
Mixed 636
SusWrite 358
188% 838 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 54.5
164% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 647
467% 602 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 143%
Great: 236%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
111GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 56 11 29 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 145
Write 67.6
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 30.8
89% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.8
196% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $653
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback