Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220601
Uptime	10.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H 1,531 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 176 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 585 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 830 51% 830 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 1E21) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 52.5 Parallax 34 32% 41.9 fps	MRender 14.9 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 49.5 32% 36.7 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GB 12,375 User benchmarks, average bench 188% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 423 315 328 298 324 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,525 Write 1,513 Mixed 1,196 SusWrite 431 261% 1,166 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 47 153% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 806 DQ Write 462 DQ Mixed 856 578% 708 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 237%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 34,988 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 147GB free Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 1268 1269 1264 1265 1264 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 2,011 Write 2,153 Mixed 1,428 SusWrite 1,308 388% 1,725 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 54.2 174% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 843 DQ Write 681 DQ Mixed 953 662% 826 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-035.A00G Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 25.2 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 20.6 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	54	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	154x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	29x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	101x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	82x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	34x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	26x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	24x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	52x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	36x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16