HP OMEN Laptop 15-en1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN Laptop 15-en1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88D1
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 234
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 732
71% 585 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
HP(103C 88D1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 49%
Great: 105%
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 88D1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 33.1
20% 26.2 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 22.3
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 1175 1138 1145 1181 1165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,634
Write 1,410
Mixed 654
SusWrite 1,171
272% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29
97% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 590
447% 598 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 194%
Great: 333%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
137GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 855 689 632 610 577 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,685
Write 1,500
Mixed 1,294
SusWrite 730
292% 1,302 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 37.4
122% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 624
471% 629 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 178%
Great: 346%
KINGSTON SA400S37480G 480GB
287GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 170 166 237 206 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 100
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 204
190% 149 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 8.6
778% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 10.1
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 11.9
932% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 118%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 28.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32G2WG3
Typical OMEN Laptop 15-en1xxx Builds (Compare 1,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN Laptop 15-en1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback