HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85FF
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 13:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 219
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 637
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
HP(103C 85FF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.7% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 50.9
48% 56.9 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 51
Splatting 48.9
39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 142 126 117 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 742
Write 84
Mixed 127
SusWrite 127
58% 270 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 18.5
96% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 231
225% 375 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 211 58 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO439D
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback