PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | CMS 7200-5571A (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0 |
Memory | 27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20190712 |
Uptime | 3.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '23 at 12:12 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 420 435 448 463 458 MB/s
|
93.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HUH728080ALE601 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: A4GL0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 195 182 191 184 176 MB/s
|
99.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST1000NM0055 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 194 196 199 199 200 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
KLEVV KD4AGUA80-32A160U 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 44 | 10 | 60 | 23" | 1920 1009 | AOC2369 2369M |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 186x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 11x |
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 126x |
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 47%, 22,284 samples | 39x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $335 |