Acer Aspire A315-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-58  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Camellia_TL
Memory15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 12:06
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 244
73% 141 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 323
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 12.8
9% 10.5 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 13.2
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SHGP31-500GM 500GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 806 721 813 786 771 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 1,814
Mixed 1,427
SusWrite 795
326% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 65.8
219% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 569
420% 555 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 213%
Great: 375%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23.6" 1280 720 SAM0F3B SAMSUNG
Typical Aspire A315-58 Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback