Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 960GC-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 10:15
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 3280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 56
40% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 98.5
8-Core 120
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 38.5
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 7.4 32 48 83 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 199
Write 166
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 39.8
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 7.5
31% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 58%
IC35L120AVV207-0 124GB
85GB free
Firmware: V24OA66A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 28.8
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 15
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 30%
Maxtor STM3250820A 250GB
141GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 53.7
Write 24.8
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 15
21% 29 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
680GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 97 95 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 97
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 92.8
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
393GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 73 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 73.1
Write 41.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 70.4
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 20 60 23.8" 1280 720 IVM6128 X2483/2481
Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback