Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '23 at 09:45
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500-$173 43,089 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 658 72% 570 Pts	64-Core 660 41% 660 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 8855) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 99 Parallax 91 85% 98 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 91.9 Splatting 78.2 72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB480G6 480GB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: G2010150 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 401 408 391 427 428 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 314 Write 415 Mixed 287 SusWrite 408 81% 356 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 34.6 129% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 240 182% 245 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 98%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$97 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: RR04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 181 184 181 182 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 212 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 183 122% 166 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 428% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 24.6 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 34.3 SC Mixed 25.8 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	72.3"	1280 720	SNY0801 SONY TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,871x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	867x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	461x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	396x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	356x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	511x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	239x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	200x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	499x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	166x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16